My third essay assignment was by far the hardest one for me. I was asked to write about one of several essay excerpts my teacher presented to us and I chose this one (trust me – this was one of the best ones):
-----------------
From “Living Like Weasels” by Annie Dillard
What does a weasel think about? He won't say. His journal is tracks in clay, a spray of feathers, mouse blood and bone: uncollected, unconnected, loose leaf, and blown.
I would like to learn, or remember, how to live. ..I don't think I can learn from a wild animal how to live in particular--shall I suck warm blood, hold my tail high, walk with my footprints precisely over the prints of my hands?--but I might learn something of mindlessness, something of the purity of living in the physical sense and the dignity of living without bias or motive. The weasel lives in necessity and we live in choice, hating necessity and dying at the last ignobly in its talons. I would like to live as I should, as the weasel lives as he should. And I suspect that for me the way is like the weasel's: open to time and death painlessly, noticing everything, remembering nothing, choosing the given with a fierce and pointed will.
-----------------
I was given a B+ for this one because my teacher felt I assumed too much about the author and her intention regarding her essay.
Essay Three: The Human Folly
Either humans do have not a clue how to live, or Annie Dillard has gone mad. While she admits she cannot find all the answers from a wild animal, she believes she can “learn, or remember, how to live.” She sees clarity in the weasel’s life because it is void of complex thought and emotion. A weasel lives peacefully with only what is necessary, while humans do not appreciate what we have and envy what we do not have. Dillard states, “I would like to live as I should, as the weasel lives as he should… choosing the given with a fierce and pointed will.” laying aside her cognitive mind and her ability to choose. Happily and without hesitation she would take what is thrust upon her.
It is odd for Dillard to state that she has not yet learned how to live. She is, in fact, alive when writing this piece, so what is she really saying? The answer goes beyond simply admiring a serene animal in its element. She believes there are so many problems in her life that she can no longer remember how to be happy. She even questions if she ever learned how to be happy, or in her words, “learn{ed} how to live.” Poor choices (she does not say whose choices) have pushed her to a point where she wants to abandon her life as she knows it. She is not content with the way she is living and she finds herself wishing to give up her ability to choose. The ability to choose is one of the major things that separate humans from animals but she would give it up, claiming nothing, and living only in the present.
Dillard sees purity of life coming from “mindlessness”. In her eyes, a wild animal is mindless, meaning either the creature has no mind at all, or that it has lost its mind. Without a presence of mind it can go on “without bias or motive.” I would argue, though, that even the smallest creature has a motive: to live or to die, to sink or to swim, to eat or to be eaten. An animal fends for itself, finding food and safety in order to survive. It is aware of danger and remembers where and how to avoid it.
Humans have also done this well, and perhaps better. When inspiration hit, we invented more efficient tools. When we focused our will we discovered better and more reliable ways to do things. We pooled our resources, helped our neighbors and became a community. I say perhaps humans have done better because even though we have achieved so much, recklessness came with success. We started to take for granted all that our ancestors worked so hard for. Dillard accuses humans of hating “necessity” or those basic things needed to keep us alive. She finds us frivolous and vain and naïve to the fact that we will not be taking our material possessions with us to the grave. She sees present day humans as wasteful creatures, hating that which would ultimately make us happy and instead choosing what is dispensable. It can be hard to disprove her when creators of energy drinks are making millions because we down high doses of caffeine each day instead of taking care of one of our most basic needs – sleep.
Is it too late for humans? Have animals surpassed us when it comes to real happiness? It is easy to agree with Dillard that an animal might have the better life when we view our world as a whole. Americans live lavishly compared to other nations on this earth, and it is a shame. Our dumps could provide for whole villages; our junk could offer more comfortable living for those in need. Instead of fixing a bike, we throw it away and buy a new one. We have lost (or forsaken) our skill for improvement, for creativity, for industry.
We may have drifted too far and need to come back to “live as {we} should.” It is because we do have a choice, however, that we are able to reflect on what needs to change and resolve ourselves to that change. How silly and how sad it would be to give up our ability to choose. Generations before us have poured themselves into the cause of better living. To throw away all their hard work would be a tragedy. Dillard claims that seeing everything and remembering nothing is better, but remembering nothing is not better. We must remember what we see. It is in forgetting what we have seen that we mistake indulgence with necessity.
Animals survive quite well without luxury and with little resources, though living in survival mode is not the better life. Instead of envying the weasel’s peacefulness, Dillard should make her own. She can take charge and make her life what she wants it to be, as we all can. Choice gives us the ability to shrug off the bad and embrace the good. The pursuit of happiness is ours if we want it.
Annie Dillard may be mad, but she makes a good point. With a bit of observation, we can learn a few things from the weasel: resourcefulness, tranquility and humility. The trick is to take what we learn and apply it to our lives. With determination and a will to be reckoned with, what she calls “purity of life” can be found almost anywhere – the choice is ours.